Click
above, for articles in
this issue.
Presidency in
Perpetuity
by
Tajudeen Abdul-Raheem
In his weekly column, Tajudeen
Abdul-Raheem tackles three African presidents who appear to have ambitions to
rule until they drop dead. Omar Bongo of Gabon, Yoweri Musevini of Uganda and
Olushegun Obasanjo of Nigeria are either firmly entrenched as leaders for life
or are busy manipulating electoral laws so they can serve beyond their given
time. Abdul-Raheem asks why these leaders see it as their god-given right to
rule and rule and rule...
The more Africa changes the more it remains the
same at the level of leadership. While it is no longer an issue for debate that
we should choose our own leaders in a democratic election there are many
challenges in the processes that may make cynics proclaim that we are only
making a distinction without any fundamental difference.
Our dictators
have learnt how to repackage themselves with a veneer of electoral democracy
that ensues that we 'vote without choosing' since the outcome often remains the
same. In the past few years constitutionalism has also made a come back across
Africa but - unwilling democrats that many of the leaders are - they have found
ways of constitutionalising their illegitimacy by following a constitutional
route to deny their peoples the democratic right to genuine changes and
alternatives in public policy.
Take the cases of three presidents from
different regions of Africa who have become the symbols of this constitutional
gerymandering. The first one holds the dubious title of being Africa's longest
–serving (I am not sure what services any more), President, El Hadj Omar Bongo
of the oil-rich Central African state of Gabon. He has been in power since 1967
and has just secured for himself another seven-year term at the presidential
palace, which will ensure that he remains in power till he is 75 years old
(officially). After that term, if both nature and the ancestors have not called
him home, we can be sure that there will be no shortage of footloose
opportunists to orchestrate 'one more term'. Bongo has ensured that he runs and
runs till he drops dead. This is where his presidential run and re-run
interfaces with that of the second president, retired general Yoweri Kaguta
Museveni of Uganda, whose onward march to another term was the subject of this
column last week.
I got many responses from both the Museveni camp and
even more from the anti-Museveni group on that article. The president's men and
women typically become legalistic on the issue, arguing that now that Ugandans
have spoken through a referendum and there has been appropriate change to the
constitution, the President is not doing anything unconstitutional.
They
overstate their democratic credentials by stating the seemingly obvious: Ugandan
voters are supreme they say and whatever they decide is sacrosanct. It is a very
beguiling democratic case even if democracy is the last thing on the minds of
those pushing it. It is always amusing to me why Ugandans are supreme over the
issue of Museveni running again but have neither been supreme on the key
economic decisions of the government or the various wars the country has been
involved in for the past two decades. Not even elected members of Parliament
have any influence on the government's neo-liberal policies yet the people are
supreme!
On the other side of the debate the anti 'sad term' camp think I
have become too complacent about Museveni's self-succession. I had concluded my
article last week matter-of-factly that five years will soon come to pass. But
the fear of many in the opposition is that it is not just the next five years
that Museveni and his cronies want but the next one, and the one after that and
probably another one after that until the president gives up the ghost. In a
sense self-succession in perpetuity - like Bongo's.
I must confess that I
have no answer to that speculation because there is something that happens to
our presidents once they enter office that they find ways and means of
perpetuating themselves. People often blame opportunists around them but I think
that is a lazy approach. There is no adviser that will compel an unwilling
president to remain in office for a minute longer if he is not that
inclined.
Unfortunately Museveni is not alone in the struggle for
presidency in perpetuity. And that leads us to the third president, another
retired general, Chief Mathew Aremu Olushegun Obasanjo. I have been in Nigeria
for the past three weeks and the big political issue is about the quest for
another term by President Obasanjo.
Like Museveni's supporters when his
campaign first started to change the constitution, Obasanjo's people are saying
the president has not decided either way. Like President Museveni, Obasanjo
rarely addresses the issue directly and when he does he says defensively that
the constitution does not allow him to go beyond two consecutive terms and he
has pledged to uphold the constitution. However, as it happened in Uganda his
agents and political contractors are busy pushing for constitutional amendments
that will allow him to stand for another term and thereby constitutionalising
his self-succession as has happened in Uganda.
It is obvious that the
three compare notes on how to deceive their peoples. It is sad that, in spite of
the new African Peer Review Mechanism, they do not compare notes on how to
improve the lot of their peoples.
Dr.
Tajudeen Abdul-Raheem is General-Secretary of the Pan African Movement,
Kampala (Uganda) and Co-Director of Justice Africa. This essay is herein
reprinted with the author's consent.
Posted December 05, 2005
URL: www.thecitizenfsr.org
SM
2000-2011
You are here: HOME page-OLDER ISSUES-DECEMBER 2005-Africa Today-Presidency
Next : Kenya
|