Click
above, for articles in
this issue.
Priorities
By
Ralph Nader
A
society reveals its values, priorities and distribution of power in the way
its
rulers
punish deviant behavior. Here are some examples for you to
ponder:
Members
of Congress were in an uproar recently over a MoveOn.Org
political
advertisement
in the New York Times titled “General Petraeus or General Betray Us?”
The
following copy alerted readers to their belief that he may likely testify before
Congress
as a political General reflecting the rosy views on the Iraq war-quagmire
by his
commander-in-chief, George W. Bush.
How
dare MoveOn.Org criticize a General in the midst of' Bush’s war of
choice,
growled
Republicans and some Democrats as the Senators rushed to overwhelmingly vote for
a resolution condemning the ad?
How
dare those many Americans who criticized Civil War Generals, World War Two
Generals,
Korean War Generals (remember General Douglas MacArthur) and Vietnam War
Generals (remember General William Westmoreland)?
This
kind of criticism inside Army, inside the Congress and among the citizenry has
been
as American as apple pie.
How
come a similar uproar has not come forth about the many female U.S. soldiers in
Iraq raped or sexually harassed by male soldiers who are often their
superiors?
Where
are the generals to crack down on these outrages? This story was documented in a
long cover story in the New York Times Magazine some months ago, citing numerous
sources, including the Pentagon.
Senators
demanded the resignation of Senator Larry Craig (R-ID) caught in a toilet
sting
operation at Minneapolis airport. Senator Craig – he now says foolishly so –
pleaded
guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct. For doing what? As Frank Rich
described
the situation in the New York Times: “He didn't have sex in a public
place.
He didn’t expose himself. His toe tapping, hand signals and ‘wide stance’
were
at most a form of flirtation.”
Conservative
columnist, George Will expressed similar views.
The
penalty for Senator Craig is likely termination of his Senate career but not one
required
by law. Just by pressure from his “pure” Senate
colleagues.
Now
contrast what should be required of George W. Bush by our Constitution, laws and
international treaties to which the U.S. is a signatory nation.
Plunging
our nation into an unconstitutional war of massive carnage and cost, and
committing
numerous, repeated crimes along the way, from widespread torture in violation
of U.S. law and the Geneva conventions to spying on Americans without
court
approval (a felony), does not agitate the Senators as did the airport toilet
tapping.
Added
to the Bush presidency's serial and continuing crimes are his bungling and
incompetence.
He has enriched crooked corporations, burned tens of billions of taxpayer
dollars and most seriously, deprived soldiers of sufficient body and humvee
armor
year after year, which has cost the lives and limbs of thousands of American
GIs.
In a
US court of law, such behavior would be judged criminal
negligence.
Yet,
there has been no demand from Congress for his impeachment, or his resignation,
or even any support for Senator Russ Feingold's modest resolution of censure
(S.Res. 302 and 303).
Bush's
Justice Department has thrown the book at several plaintiff lawyers
for
paying
people to be lead plaintiffs in securities fraud cases while not
pursuing
well
over 90% of the corporate crooks who actually stole big money from investors
and
shareholders while paying themselves compensation beyond their dreams of
avarice.
If the
Department needed a bigger budget to go after this corporate crime wave, they
should have requested it from Congress. The resulting fines and restitutions
alone would have paid for such an enlarged law and order
drive.
I am
sure you can cite many examples of public hypocrisy, double standards and
inverted
priorities from your knowledge and experience. There are many explanations about
why and how these powerbrokers and powerholders get away with such
behavior.
But
let us remember Abraham Lincoln’s observation about the power of
“public
sentiments.”
We need to inform, focus and deliver a different quality and quantity
of
“public sentiments” directly to our allegedly public servants.
So
that they start to sweat the big stuff.
Ralph Nader, attorney, author, was a green
party candidate for U.S. President in both the 2000 and 2004 campaigns. He
has been a prominent environmentalist and consumer advocate for several decades,
who founded along the way, several non profit organizations that are still
active; his accomplishments, like forcing U.S. auto companies to install seat
belts, are legendary. His most recent book is The Seventeen Traditions.
This essay is herein reprinted with the author's
permission.
Posted October 05, 2007
URL:
www.thecitizenfsr.org
SM
2000-2011
You are here: HOME page-SUMMER 2007 Issue-Priorities
Previous : The Grand Illusion
|