Click
above, for articles in
this issue.
Preserve the People’s Post
Office
by
Ralph Nader
When I was growing up in New
England during the 1940’s, the symbol for reliability, punctuality, and
efficiency was the United States Post Office. Indeed, people could almost tell
the time of day by the postman’s twice a day delivery rounds.
Unfortunately,
ever since President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed a commission to reorganize the
Post Office on “a business basis” in 1967, the postal system has been in a
defensive posture, tied down by demands from such groups as major corporate
mailers, competitive rivals, and partisan politicos. There has been no place for
bold new ventures of the past, such as Rural Free Delivery, Parcel Post, Postal
Savings, or Air Mail. If the Post Office Department had been responding to the
profit-making demands of the market or to the political influence of large
corporations none of these advances would have even been attempted. Parcel Post,
lest we forget, was introduced in the face of corporate competitors’ opposition
due to the fact that they were providing an entirely unsatisfactory, oftentimes
price gouging, service to large parts of the nation.
President
Ronald Reagan called government “the problem.” Was government the problem when
the Post Office made open communications between the Continental Congress and
George Washington’s army possible during the Revolutionary War? Was government
the problem when the Post Office provided invaluable aid to the establishment of
a vibrant national and local press by delivering periodicals throughout the
land? How about when the Post Office Department constructed a national
infrastructure for aviation? Is government the problem when letters and packages
from home reach military personnel in distant parts of the world today? Or when
citizen organizations are enabled or often made possible by a non-profit postage
rate? When universal service – uniform service at uniform rates throughout the
country – allows friends and families to exchange letters, cards, and packages?
When semi-postals raise tens of millions of dollars for breast cancer research?
When the National Association of Letter Carriers’ National Food Drive collects
over 70 million pounds of food to help alleviate the nation’s shameful hunger
crisis? Through the postal system, as Christopher Shaw describes in Preserving
the People’s Post Office, the national government has long played a beneficial
role in our lives. For that and other ideological reasons, corporatists with no
regard for the value of universal postal service are waging a campaign to
destroy the world’s finest postal system.
Absence
of an understanding of the Postal Service as a public service has allowed
corporatists to obscure our postal system’s defining mission: “to bind the
nation together.” There are promoters of a corporate postal system who would
ultimately like to steal the Postal Service from the American people by
eliminating its public service function and “privatizing” (i.e. corporatizing)
it. Operation of the postal system on “a business basis” has helped make their
case for them.
Preserving
the People’s Post Office demonstrates how a patronizing attitude toward the
individual postal patron – “Aunt Minnie” – that accompanies a corporate mindset
has caused service reductions for the general public, as the relentless pressure
of corporate demands for receiving preferential services burdens the citizenry
more and more. Instead of focusing on new ways for our government to serve its
citizens through the Postal Service, service reductions – such as closing post
offices, removing collection boxes, and ending door delivery – have shifted
emphasis to business practices focusing on how much the traffic will bear,
further diminishing the spirit of public service. The recent push for postal
“reform” legislation demonstrates the degree to which the public has been
marginalized. Postal Service management, major mailers, corporate ideologues,
business competitors, postmaster associations and the beleaguered postal unions
have all been included in this legislative process, but there has been a
noticeable absence – the consumer, who has been excluded from having a seat at
the table. Instead of being discarded, as they largely should have been, the
recommendations of the recent corporate dominated President’s Commission on the
Postal Service, which were not public service oriented, are apparent in the
legislation.
Postal
unions and postmaster associations represent memberships committed to serving
patrons, and these organizations do show a willingness to reach out to
consumers. But the American Postal Workers Union has been the sole union voice
consistently advocating the universal public service principle. Greater efforts
on this front could reap even larger rewards for both postal employees and
postal patrons, as united they could forge jointly a more robust and vital
Postal Service. An annual “Postal Appreciation Day” held in towns throughout
America, replete with a parade to the downtown post office, would provide an
opportunity for postal workers and postal patrons to unite, interact, and
demonstrate their shared esteem for this valuable public institution.
Fortunately
there is a single solution that would go a long way toward solving this lack of
organized and skilled consumer participation – the proposal for an independent
non-profit Post Office Consumer Action Group (POCAG). Several million people
would join. All that is required is a simple law directing the Postal Service to
send residential postal patrons a letter twice-a-year giving them the
opportunity to pay a small amount of dues in order to join POCAG. Postal
officials have been putting off this proposal for decades, but their excuses for
not delivering materials making consumers aware of POCAG become more and more
indefensible: The Postal Service has now begun delivering postcards to all
residences nationwide carrying postal promotional messages from cartoon
characters. So why not send a notice for POCAG? Through this suggested action
group, residential postal consumers can become organized, as Mr. Shaw describes,
to shape consumer-friendly postal policies and create an expanding and vigorous
American postal system that would make our first Postmaster General Benjamin
Franklin proud.
For
more information contact info@csrl.org or send an old fashioned letter to Mr.
Christopher Shaw, P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036.
Ralph Nader was a candidate for
U.S. President in both the 2000 and 2004 campaigns. He has been a consumer
advocate for several decades, who founded along the way, several non profit
organizations that are still active; his accomplishments are
legendary.
This essay has been reprinted herein with the author's
permission.
Posted December 20, 2006
URL:
www.thecitizenfsr.org
SM
2000-2011
You are here: HOME page-NEWSLETTER-DECEMBER 2006-Preserve... Post Off
Previous : OC & Government Next : Open Letter
|