THE CITIZEN for Social Responsibility 

    a non-profit corporation

    Founded   April  2000

 

SM

IN MEMORIAM
BRIEF INTRODUCTION
INSPIRATION
NEWS-LINK TICKER
SPRING 2011 issue
SPRING 2009 Issue
SPRING 2008 Issue
WINTER 2007 Issue
SUMMER 2007 Issue
NEWSLETTER
OLDER ISSUES
9-11 DOSSIER
VIRTUAL LIBRARY
BOOKS
LINKS
COUNSELING
ABOUT us
CONTACT us
SITE INDEX
SEARCH
EVENTS CALENDAR
DECEMBER 2005 · OCTOBER 2005 · AUGUST 2005  · JUNE 2005 · APRIL 2005 · FEBRUARY 2005 · DECEMBER 2004 · NOVEMBER 2004  · OCTOBER 2004  · SEPTEMBER 2004  · AUGUST 2004  · IMAGE GALLERY
Dispatches from Iraq · In Retrospect · Recommended Reading · Words of Inspiration · Hightower Lowdown · Trento Column · Organized Crime... · Editorial page
Banning Sexy...  · Protecting...

Click above, for articles in this issue.


 

 

    by Jim Hightower

 

 

 

BANNING SEXY CHEERLEADERS

 

Is there something about being elected to a state legislature that automatically turns an otherwise normal person's brain to silly putty? Medical science needs to study this.

Wherever you live, if you take a look at your state legislative body, you'll most likely gag and say to yourself: "What a parade of fools." But let me assure you that your fools will be elevated in your eyes to the vaunted status of noble Athenian statesmen if you'll measure them against the platinum standard of legislative idiocy and ineptitude: Texas.

I ask you, has your state legislature taken the time to contemplate the pressing public need to regulate the gyrations of high school teenagers? Texas has, so I rest my case We're Number One!

State Rep. Al Edwards has boldly gone where only fools dare tread into the suffocating swamp of teenage hormonal behavior. He's the sponsor of the Texas Sexy Cheerleader bill, which dictates that our state education agency must intervene whenever cheerleaders in any local school district perform "in a manner that is overly sexually suggestive." Al's bill does not define either "overtly" or "sexually suggestive," leaving such niceties to the Pom-Pom police that, presumably, will be in the stands with binoculars trained on the teen bottoms of all of our cheerleaders, chronicling every sexually suggestive twitch and jiggle. Needless to say, the education agency was instantly flooded with applicants eager to serve on this Don't-Shake-Your-Booty Regulatory Agency.

When the bill reached the house floor, saner legislators derided it as "ridiculous," "stupid," "insulting," and "a disgrace" yet it passed the house! This is the same legislature, by the way, that won't devise a financing plan that would raise our schools to the educational level, of say, Mississippi but by gollies, Texas is Number One in guarding against devilish dancing by cheerleaders.

 

 

SOURCES:  "Hip hip, but no hurray," Baltimore Sun, May 8, 2005.
"House 'horseplay' is nothing to cheer about, Austin American-Statesman, May 5, 2005.

 

(c) 2005, Copyright - Saddleburr Productions, Inc.  Reprinted with the permission of the author.

 

 


Updated  June 01, 2005

URL:  www.thecitizenfsr.org                     SM 2000-2011      


 


You are here: HOME page-OLDER ISSUES-JUNE 2005-Hightower Lowdown-Banning Sexy...

Next : Protecting...