THE CITIZEN for Social Responsibility 

    a non-profit corporation

    Founded   April  2000

 

SM

IN MEMORIAM
BRIEF INTRODUCTION
INSPIRATION
NEWS-LINK TICKER
SPRING 2011 issue
SPRING 2009 Issue
SPRING 2008 Issue
WINTER 2007 Issue
SUMMER 2007 Issue
NEWSLETTER
OLDER ISSUES
9-11 DOSSIER
VIRTUAL LIBRARY
BOOKS
LINKS
COUNSELING
ABOUT us
CONTACT us
SITE INDEX
SEARCH
EVENTS CALENDAR
DECEMBER 2005 · OCTOBER 2005 · AUGUST 2005  · JUNE 2005 · APRIL 2005 · FEBRUARY 2005 · DECEMBER 2004 · NOVEMBER 2004  · OCTOBER 2004  · SEPTEMBER 2004  · AUGUST 2004  · IMAGE GALLERY
Current Events · Africa Today · Eye on Human Rights · Dispatches from Iraq · In Retrospect · Words of Inspiration · Hightower Lowdown · Trento Column · Editorial page
Robertson  · Bushes at war  · Library records  · Poll Tax

Click above, for articles in this issue.

 

                         

 

                        by Jim Hightower

 

 

WHY AREN'T THE BUSHES AT WAR?

George W is the kind of guy who'll gladly sacrifice your life for his country.

Not only was he a cheerleader when he was in college at Yale, but he also was an energetic cheerleader for the war that was raging in Vietnam at the time. Of course, he cheered from a safe distance, using family connections to make certain that he personally would not have to do any fighting.

Now that he's in the White House, Bush is cheerleader-in-chief for his own war. In a recent speech designed to shore-up sagging public support for his misadventure in Iraq, he referred to the terrible fact that nearly 2000 Americans have already died there. Of these dead troops, Bush said, "We owe them something," by which he meant continuing the war. What a callous payback: Many have died, so many more must die to pay tribute to those who've died. That's a war rationale chasing its own tail.

But when he says that "we" must war on, he certainly does not mean that any of his own family members should be among those Americans who'll face death. Neither of his twin daughters, who are of primo enlistment age, have signed up for what their Daddy tells others is a "noble cause." Nor will you find any of his eight enlistment- age nieces and nephews anywhere near his war. Apparently, the cause is not quite noble enough for the Bushes to join it.

How ironic that the Pentagon can't recruit enough soldiers to meet its monthly quota for Iraq yet there are ten good prospects in the president's own family. A White House spokeswoman responded curtly to this curiosity: "There are many ways for people to serve their country." Contrast the Bushes unwillingness to step forward to the example set by Franklin Roosevelt's family all four of his sons served admirably in World War II.

This is Jim Hightower saying... A petition is circulating to demand either that Bush's kids put their lives on the line... or that Bush bring all the troops home. To sign, go to buzzflash.com.

 

Sources:

"Questioning Bush's Sacrifice for a 'Noble Cause,'" The Washington Post, September 1, 2005.

(c) 2005, Copyright - Saddleburr Productions, Inc.  This essay is herein reprinted with the author's consent.

 


Posted  October 05, 2005

URL:  www.thecitizenfsr.org                     SM 2000-2011                        


 


You are here: HOME page-OLDER ISSUES-OCTOBER 2005-Hightower Lowdown-Bushes at war

Previous : Robertson Next : Library records